Interview
Ask participants whether the strongest assumption is real.
AI Focus Group
AI Focus Group for evidence-led scenario rehearsal
Use MiroFish when moderated synthetic discussion before recruiting needs more than a one-shot answer. MiroFish uses seed material, named actors, reaction rounds, and structured reports; treat every run as decision support, not a guaranteed prediction.
Operating facts
Keep the limits visible before opening the console.
WorkflowMiroFish uses seed material, graph context, simulated participants and moderator, interaction rounds, and structured reports for ai focus group.
Decision boundaryA ai focus group run is decision support, not a guaranteed prediction.
Useful inputThe first useful ai focus group run needs participants, moderator, themes, timing, constraints, and the strongest contrary signal.
Scenario angle
The useful question is where moderated synthetic discussion before recruiting breaks.
For ai focus group, the page is worth its own route because the reader needs a bounded rehearsal around participants, moderator, themes. Start by asking which role can change the story first, then keep that role visible through the report review.
Validation plan
Turn output into real checks.
Evidence pull
Refresh facts that may have changed since the source packet was written.
Rerun
Change one assumption around moderated synthetic discussion before recruiting and compare the new branch map with the original.
Failure modes
Reject weak runs before they waste attention.
Vague actors
If everyone is the audience, nobody has a useful incentive.
Missing evidence
If the source packet is empty, the result becomes generic.
False certainty
If the output sounds final, rewrite the decision as a branch.
Evidence choice
Pick source material that can be challenged later.
The first run should include participants, moderator, themes, timing, constraints, and the strongest contrary signal. If a source is old, ambiguous, or politically loaded, mark it before running ai focus group so the report does not treat a weak claim as settled.
First run
Copy a bounded brief into MiroFish.
Run a ai focus group scenario. Use this source packet, the decision boundary, the actor roles, known objections, and the signals that would change the conclusion. Return reaction branches, weak assumptions, and one validation plan. Do not treat the report as a guaranteed outcome.
Workflow
Move from brief to review in four deliberate steps.
Frame moderatedFrame moderated synthetic discussion before recruiting with one decision boundary.
Build anBuild an actor graph for Participants, Moderator, Themes.
Run reactionRun reaction rounds and watch for moderator changing the interpretation of moderated synthetic discussion before recruiting.
Question theQuestion the report and check participants against themes before treating the branch as useful.
Outside check
Leave with one verification move, not a pile of guesses.
The best next step after a ai focus group run is to check participants against themes before treating the branch as useful. That keeps the simulation useful without pretending it measured the real world.
Direct answer
Use this when the question depends on reactions, not only facts.
AI Focus Group fits MiroFish when moderated synthetic discussion before recruiting could be changed by participants, moderator, or themes. The useful result is a branch map with weak assumptions and the next outside check, not a single confident verdict.
Review owner
Name the person who can say the branch is weak.
Before using ai focus group output, assign one reviewer to challenge participants, one to challenge moderator, and one to decide whether themes changes the next action.
FAQ
AI Focus Group FAQ
What should I prepare for ai focus group?
Prepare the decision boundary, source notes, actor roles, known objections, timing, and the signals that would change the result.
Can ai focus group replace real evidence?
No. Use it to generate hypotheses, pressure points, and validation questions, then confirm important claims with real data or accountable review.
What does MiroFish return?
A structured report with reaction paths, weak assumptions, evidence gaps, and follow-up questions you can challenge.
When should I rerun it?
Rerun after changing one important assumption, such as the actor list, timing window, evidence strength, or public message.
Next paths