Simulated perspectives
Agent personas are the simulated people, organizations, or stakeholder roles that react inside a MiroFish run. They should be grounded by source material and reviewed before their reactions shape a report.
When people ask about agent personas, they usually want to know how simulated perspectives are created and what they are allowed to represent. In MiroFish, personas are not private profiles. They are role-based viewpoints built from seed material, graph context, and scenario goals.
A good persona has a clear role, incentives, knowledge boundary, likely objections, and constraints. A weak persona is just a label with a mood attached.
Use these steps to move from a broad phrase to a reviewable scenario, report, or clarification.
Customer, investor, regulator, competitor, fan, critic, operator, or internal team.
A persona reacts more usefully when its motivation and constraint are visible.
Do not let every persona know every private detail unless the scenario requires it.
Check whether the set is balanced enough to reveal disagreement.
Draft the first MiroFish run on this page before opening a workspace.
These checkpoints keep the page tightly matched to the exact search phrase while staying useful for a real MiroFish run.
Design the persona set like a coverage map. Start with the stakeholder groups that can change the outcome, then give each role a reason to care. A buyer persona may care about proof and switching cost, while an operator may care about rollout burden, and a skeptic may test the weakest claim. The goal is not theatrical variety; it is useful disagreement.
Each card should expose role, goal, constraint, knowledge boundary, and likely objection. Those fields keep the persona auditable. If a reaction appears in the event stream, the reviewer can ask whether it follows from the card or whether the setup accidentally allowed every role to know the same facts and share the same incentive.
Persona design also affects fairness. Do not invent private attributes or sensitive traits to make a role feel realistic. Use public context, user-provided source material, and role-level incentives. The right level of detail is enough to explain reactions without pretending to know a real person.
After a run, evaluate the persona mix by looking at divergence. If every role reacts the same way, the set may be too narrow or the incentives may be too vague. If one role dominates every branch, add a counterweight or tighten the source boundary. The purpose is a balanced simulation that reveals useful tensions for the report.
Before acting on a MiroFish output, check whether the scenario stayed inside the question you asked. The most useful output for this page is: A set of reviewable simulated perspectives that can interact, disagree, respond to events, and feed a report with role-specific evidence. The key limit is equally important: Do not use personas to impersonate private individuals or invent sensitive personal details. Keep them role-based and source-grounded.
Use these checkpoints to turn the first MiroFish result into a grounded next action.
The video starts with the homepage, shows seed material upload, moves through graph construction and agent setup, and ends with a professional report screen.
These images come from the notepad MiroFish image set and are used as concrete workflow references rather than decoration.
For a pricing scenario, MiroFish might create buyer, procurement, competitor, customer-success, and skeptical analyst personas. The report becomes better when those personas disagree for traceable reasons.
The value of the page is practical: define the job, prepare the right input, read the output with its limits visible, and choose a next step that can be checked outside the page.
Read a MiroFish report as a map of assumptions and reactions. Mark source-backed claims, uncertain claims, and follow-up questions separately. Then choose one change for the next run instead of accepting the first report as final.
Use the table to decide what belongs in the page, what belongs in MiroFish, and what still needs outside verification.
| Part | What it means | Why it helps | Check before acting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Role | Who the persona represents | Defines perspective | Avoid private identity claims |
| Incentive | What the persona wants or avoids | Creates realistic tension | Keep it source-grounded |
| Knowledge boundary | What the persona can know | Prevents unrealistic reactions | Limit private context |
| Behavior cue | How the persona responds under pressure | Improves simulation contrast | Review before report |
These related MiroFish pages keep the workflow connected from the homepage to the current topic and back into action.
Continue the MiroFish workflow with this related guide.
Open guideContinue the MiroFish workflow with this related guide.
Open guideContinue the MiroFish workflow with this related guide.
Open guideContinue the MiroFish workflow with this related guide.
Open guideShort answers for readers who need the useful boundary before opening a MiroFish workspace.
No. They are simulated perspectives or stakeholder roles.
Use enough to represent the important disagreements, but start small for the first run.
They can react to events, but the initial role and knowledge boundaries should stay inspectable.